Controversial far-right activist Tommy Robinson, real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, was detained under the Terrorism Act at the Channel Tunnel in Folkestone, Kent. The arrest, which occurred on Sunday, comes a day after Robinson organized a major demonstration in central London that saw thousands participate and sparked significant counter-protests.

Kent Police confirmed that Robinson was stopped under schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000, a provision that allows officers to detain, question, and search passengers at ports, airports, and international rail terminals without initial grounds for suspicion. Robinson was reportedly arrested for “frustration of a schedule 7 examination” and has since been released on bail pending further inquiries.

The incident has ignited a flurry of reactions, with supporters of Robinson staging an impromptu protest outside Downing Street on Sunday afternoon. Images of the protest, showing demonstrators with “Free Tommy” banners, underscored the divisive nature of Robinson’s arrest.

The arrest drew commentary from across the political and social spectrum, including from Reform UK party MP Rupert Lowe who questioned the proportionality of the police action on Twitter. Discussions about the arrest also featured prominently on social platforms, with personalities like Elon Musk weighing in on the situation.

This latest legal trouble for Robinson follows his recent controversial actions, including the screening of a documentary titled “Silenced,” which allegedly contravenes a high court order. The film repeats claims about a Syrian refugee, which previously led to Robinson losing a libel case in 2021. He is scheduled to appear in high court on Monday, facing charges of contempt of court related to the documentary.

The Metropolitan Police, anticipating the weekend’s events, had deployed around 1,000 officers to manage the demonstration and maintain peace, resulting in several arrests and reports of assaults on emergency workers.

The situation remains fluid, with further details expected as inquiries continue. The case has not only reignited debates over the use of terrorism-related statutes but also highlighted ongoing tensions surrounding political demonstrations in London.