A rescue deal that held hopes of preserving the future of high street chain Wilko has fallen through, casting a shadow of uncertainty over the fate of thousands of jobs. The collapse of the proposed deal has left the billionaire owner of HMV, Doug Putman, unable to secure the future of the embattled retailer.
Doug Putman’s plan involved keeping approximately 300 Wilko stores operational, but the bid faltered due to escalating costs that complicated the arrangement. This unfortunate turn of events has left over 10,000 Wilko employees and hundreds of stores hanging in the balance.
As administrators take charge, some of Wilko’s remaining stores could potentially be sold to rival retailers like Poundland or The Range. Details regarding job losses and store closures are expected to be announced in the coming days.
Wilko had announced its financial struggles in August, officially declaring its insolvency and raising concerns about the job security of its 12,500-strong workforce. PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) had previously disclosed plans to implement 1,016 redundancies across 52 stores nationwide. Additionally, 299 redundancies have occurred at Wilko’s two distribution centres in Worksop and Newport, with more than 260 job losses recorded at its support centre.
The Range, a prominent value retailer, is reportedly engaged in advanced discussions to acquire Wilko’s brand and online assets. However, the failure of negotiations with Doug Putman represents a significant setback to the hopes of saving jobs within the troubled retailer.
In other news some of the UK’s leading retailers have jointly appealed to the Chancellor, requesting a freeze on business rates. Signatories of the letter include the CEOs of Tesco, Greggs, Marks & Spencer, and B&Q. They argue that an inflation-based hike in business rates would burden them with an additional £400 million in expenses, potentially endangering the viability of numerous stores.
The retailers pointed to existing global supply chain issues and increased costs on the horizon, such as Russia’s withdrawal from the Black Sea Grain Initiative, restrictions on Indian rice exports, and ongoing labor market challenges. Against this backdrop, they emphasised the government’s role in avoiding further burdens on businesses and urged the preservation of the current business rates multiplier.
It is worth noting that an inflation-linked rise in business rates had been scheduled for April this year but was subsequently frozen by the government. The appeal by these major retailers underscores the critical need for government support and intervention to sustain the high street retail sector during challenging economic times.
