The Gambling Commission has charged 15 individuals, including former MPs, political candidates, and party officials, in connection with an election betting scandal that has shaken Westminster and renewed scrutiny over insider conduct within UK politics.

The charges follow a lengthy investigation into suspicious bets placed on the timing of the 2024 General Election, specifically using insider knowledge of the date prior to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s official announcement of the July 4 election.

According to the Commission, the accused allegedly violated Section 42 of the Gambling Act 2005, which prohibits cheating in betting markets by using confidential information. The offence carries a maximum penalty of two years in prison, an unlimited fine, or both.

High-Profile Figures Among Those Charged

Among the charged are several prominent Conservative Party figures:

• Craig Williams, 39 – former Conservative MP and parliamentary private secretary to Rishi Sunak
• Russell George, 50 – Conservative Member of the Senedd for Montgomeryshire
• Laura Saunders, 37 – 2024 Conservative parliamentary candidate for Bristol North West
• Nick Mason, 51 – Chief Data Officer, Conservative Party
• Anthony Lee, 47 – Director of Campaigns, Conservative Party

The full list of those charged includes:

• Simon Chatfield, 51 (Farnham, GU10)
• Russell George, 50 (Newtown, SY16)
• Amy Hind, 34, and Anthony Hind, 36 (Loughton, IG10)
• Jeremy Hunt, 55 (Horley, RH6) – a former police officer
• Thomas James, 38 (Brecon, LD3)
• Charlotte Lang, 36 (Brixton, SW9)
• Anthony Lee, 47 (Bristol, BS1)
• Iain Makepeace, 47 (Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE16)
• Nick Mason, 51 (Gillingham, SP8)
• Paul Place, 53 (Hammersmith, W6)
• Laura Saunders, 37 (Bristol, BS1)
• James Ward, 40 (London, E11)
• Craig Williams, 39 (Welshpool, SY21)
• Jacob Willmer, 39 (Richmond, TW9)

All 15 are scheduled to appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on June 13, 2025.

The Investigation and Legal Framework

The Gambling Commission launched its probe in June 2024, shortly after it emerged that Craig Williams had placed a £100 bet on a July election just days before Sunak’s announcement—potentially yielding a £500 return.

What began as a narrow inquiry expanded significantly as investigators uncovered additional bets placed by Conservative Party insiders, political staff, and even a former police officer. Though Metropolitan Police investigated possible misconduct in public office, they determined in August 2024 that the threshold for such charges had not been met. However, the Gambling Commission continued its investigation under the Gambling Act 2005.

Political Fallout and Public Reaction

The scandal has triggered a fresh wave of public distrust in politics. On social media platform X, reactions were divided:

“Politicians shouldn’t profit from inside knowledge,” one user posted.
“This is why people don’t trust the system anymore.”

Others downplayed the incident, noting that betting on elections is not uncommon, and that more than 22 million UK adults place bets monthly.

Former Housing Secretary Michael Gove compared the scandal to Partygate, calling it another example of a “one rule for them” mentality that damages public confidence in democratic institutions.

Gambling Commission Responds

In a public statement, the Gambling Commission reaffirmed its commitment to ensuring fairness and integrity in betting:

“We take any allegations of cheating seriously and will continue to pursue investigations where there is evidence of wrongdoing. The public must have confidence in both the political process and the gambling industry.”

The Commission, formed under the Gambling Act 2005, regulates betting across Great Britain and has the power to investigate and prosecute under Sections 27, 28, and 42 of the Act.

Earlier this year, the Commission fined Football Pools Limited £375,000 for social responsibility failures—evidence of its increasing willingness to hold even major institutions to account.

Calls for Reform and Future Implications

The election betting scandal has reignited calls for tighter regulation of political betting, with some campaigners urging a full ban—similar to proposed reforms in the United States. Others argue such bans would impinge on personal freedoms and that transparency and oversight, not prohibition, are the way forward.

With the accused set to appear in court in June, the case could set a precedent for how insider information is handled in political spheres and prompt parliamentary debate over reforms to betting laws and political ethics.

What’s Next?

The 15 individuals charged face criminal proceedings beginning this summer. If convicted, they could face significant penalties and possible bans from holding public office or party roles in future.

The Gambling Commission has not ruled out additional charges and says further investigations remain ongoing.