A heart-wrenching case unfolds at Snaresbrook Crown Court, where parents Rinkalben Prajapati, 24, and Krunal Prajapati, 27, of Colindale, North West London, are accused of the murder of their 11-week-old baby, Hazel. The infant tragically passed away at Great Ormond Street Hospital on September 20, 2022, following a cardiac arrest at home.
Circumstances of Hazel’s Death
Baby Hazel was first taken to Northwick Park Hospital after she stopped breathing on September 16, 2022. She later died at Great Ormond Street Hospital. The case took a turn when significant injuries, including bite marks, a fractured skull, a twisted leg, and bruising, were discovered on Hazel’s body.
Parents’ Accounts and Charges
Under cross-examination by Sally O’Neill KC, Ms. Prajapati denied noticing serious injuries on Hazel until after her death. Initially, she believed the injuries occurred at Northwick Park Hospital. This perspective changed following a prison call with Mr. Prajapati, who suggested the injuries resulted from dropping Hazel.
Evidence and Allegations
A transcript of a prison call between the couple indicated Mr. Prajapati attempting to shift blame. Ms. Prajapati, upon questioning, could not recall specific details of her conversations with hospital staff on the night of Hazel’s hospitalization. She acknowledged not noticing the injuries before arriving at the hospital.
Court Proceedings
Rinkalben and Krunal Prajapati both deny the charges of murder and causing or allowing Hazel’s death. The trial, presided over by Mrs. Justice May, continues to unravel the circumstances leading to the tragic event.
Public Reaction and Concerns
The case has sparked public concern over child safety and parental responsibilities. The severity of Hazel’s injuries and the differing accounts of the events have raised questions about the parents’ credibility and the actual sequence of events leading to her death.
Conclusion
As the trial proceeds, more details are expected to emerge, providing clarity on the tragic circumstances of Hazel’s death. The case highlights the importance of vigilant child welfare and the critical role of the justice system in ensuring the safety and well-being of the most vulnerable.