In a recent development, Daniel Graham, 38, from Carlisle, has once again denied charges of illegally felling the UK’s most famous tree at Sycamore Gap, Northumberland. The incident, which occurred in September 2023, shocked the nation and sparked international outrage.
The historic Sycamore Gap tree, also known as the “Robin Hood Tree,” which stood for nearly two centuries in the Northumberland landscape, was cut down in September 2023, sparking widespread outrage. Now, the legal proceedings are underway with a trial expected to last at least 10 days.
The tree, situated along Hadrian’s Wall, was made famous by its appearance in the 1991 film “Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves,” starring Kevin Costner. The tree had become a symbol of endurance and natural beauty, attracting visitors from around the world. The loss of this landmark has sent shockwaves through local communities and beyond, raising concerns about environmental protection and the preservation of historical sites.
Two men, Graham and Adam Carruthers, are facing charges related to the destruction of the Sycamore Gap tree. Graham appeared at Newcastle Crown Court for a pre-trial hearing, where he pleaded not guilty to causing damage estimated at over £620,000 to the tree. He also denied causing approximately £1,150 worth of damage to Hadrian’s Wall, which was struck by a falling tree.
The Sycamore Gap tree had been an integral part of the Northumberland National Park landscape, serving as a backdrop for countless photos and becoming a must-visit destination for film enthusiasts and nature lovers. The National Trust, which owned the tree and the section of Hadrian’s Wall it stood beside, recognized the tree’s importance not only as a natural landmark but as a cultural icon.
As legal proceedings continue, efforts are underway to preserve the tree’s memory. The National Trust and local authorities are exploring options for the future of the site, including the possibility of planting a new tree or creating a memorial to honour the fallen landmark.
This ongoing case has reignited discussions about the protection of natural and historical sites, and the outcome of the trial will be closely watched by conservationists and the local community.
