More than 250 migrants who were detained at the Manston asylum centre in Kent after crossing the Channel are suing the UK government, alleging unlawful detention and breaches of their human rights. The claims relate to the autumn of 2022, when Manston was described by a senior union official as “a humanitarian crisis on British soil” due to overcrowding and outbreaks of infectious diseases.

The Allegations

Migrants, including victims of torture and trafficking, allege that they were held in unsanitary conditions for prolonged periods, with insufficient food, limited access to showers, and no change of clothes. Some migrants claim they were falsely imprisoned and that the government failed to uphold their basic human rights during their stay at the processing centre.

Among the claimants are:

• A 19-year-old Sudanese victim of torture and trafficking, who alleges he was detained for 33 days in Manston, often hungry, with limited access to showers and no change of clothes. He also reported being told to “go back to your country” by officials.
• A 17-year-old Kurdish boy from Iraq, who was detained for 12 days after being incorrectly classified as an adult, with his age recorded as five years older than his actual age, despite repeatedly stating he was a child.
• A woman who suffered a miscarriage during her detention.
• A teenage victim of torture who was also a trafficking survivor.

Legal Representation and Human Rights Claims

Lawyers for the migrants are arguing that the conditions at Manston were inhumane and that the government’s failure to address basic needs violated the European Convention on Human Rights.

Emily Soothill of Deighton Pierce Glynn, who is representing some of the claimants, stated:

“We consider that our clients were falsely imprisoned and that the conditions in Manston were such that their human rights were breached. People seeking asylum are more vulnerable to physical and mental illness; they have the right to be treated with dignity and should not be detained in this way.”

Jed Pennington of Wilsons solicitors, representing others, commented:

“The humanitarian crisis that unfolded at Manston in the autumn of 2022 is not what you would expect to see in a country with well-developed systems for accommodating refugees. Our clients want the truth about how it happened, who let it happen, and how to prevent this from happening again.”

Manston Asylum Centre: A Controversial Facility

Manston became notorious after reports of dangerous overcrowding and infectious disease outbreaks surfaced in 2022. Designed as a temporary processing centre, it became a makeshift detention facility for many migrants, some of whom were held for weeks.

In response to the allegations, the Home Office stated that it is reviewing the claims and will respond in court. A spokesperson noted that the government is committed to ensuring safe and humane conditions at all its facilities, but did not directly address the specific accusations.

Public and Political Reactions

The legal action has sparked a heated debate on social media and in political circles. Some argue that migrants should not be allowed to sue the government after crossing the Channel illegally, while others emphasise the humanitarian obligations of the UK.

One commentator wrote on X (formerly Twitter):

“Migrants suing the UK government for being detained in poor conditions after illegally crossing the Channel? This is a joke. What about the rights of citizens affected by illegal immigration?”

However, another user countered:

“Basic human rights don’t disappear because someone crossed a border illegally. The UK has a duty to treat people humanely, regardless of their immigration status.”

What Happens Next?

The case is expected to set a legal precedent regarding the treatment of asylum seekers and detainees in the UK. If successful, the claims could lead to compensation payouts and force the government to reassess its detention policies for migrants arriving by small boats.

The Home Office has pledged to improve conditions at Manston following the 2022 scandal but continues to face criticism from human rights groups and opposition politicians who argue that the UK must do more to protect vulnerable migrants.

As the legal battle unfolds, the spotlight remains on how the UK handles migrant arrivals and whether current practices are aligned with international human rights standards.

More from: kent